Back to Home Page of CD3WD Project or Back to list of CD3WD Publications

CLOSE THIS BOOKSmall Scale Irrigation Systems (Peace Corps)
VIEW THE DOCUMENT(introduction...)
VIEW THE DOCUMENTIntroduction
VIEW THE DOCUMENTAcknowledgements
Section 1. Concepts of irrigation design
Section 2. The soil as a reservoir for water needed by plants
Section 3. Water and plants
Section 4. Methods of measuring soil moisture content and availability
VIEW THE DOCUMENTSection 5. Water requirements
Section 6. Natural rainfall and irrigation requirements
Section 7. Topographic mapping and surveying
Section 8. Water source development
Section 9. Water distribution
Section 10. Field irrigation systems
Section 11. Drainage
VIEW THE DOCUMENTSection 12. Economic evaluation and feasibility
Section 13. Health and safety
VIEW THE DOCUMENTSuggested references
VIEW THE DOCUMENTMeasures and conversions

Section 12. Economic evaluation and feasibility

You have now reached the point where an accurate cost-benefit analysis can be made of a proposed irrigation system. A typical example of such an analysis follows.

A stream may be dammed to provide a water source. A stone masonry wall, which will wash out during the rainy season, can be constructed using an estimated 1,000 hours of labor to gather stones and construct the dam. This will have to be repeated each year.

A distribution channel will be required which is 3 m wide, 12 cm deep, and 800 m long. The estimated time to construct this channel is 2,000 man-hours. Each year, 200 hours will be required to maintain channels.

A furrow irrigation system is to be formed to cover 10 hectares. The estimated time to level the land and dig the furrows is 4,000 hours. Wooden farm turn-outs will be installed to serve three furrows from each turn-out, 50 turn-outs will be required and will cost $0.50 each when made by a local carpenter and will be replaced each year at a total cost of $25 per year.

The field will be used to produce maize. Production costs and yields and returns are shown in Table 12-1. It shows that additional production costs will be required for seed, fertilizer, pesticides, labor, and taxes.

The tabulated costs and returns show that providing irrigation without additional inputs of improved seed and fertilizer would not increase yields enough to justify the additional irrigation costs. If improved crop technology is assumed, however, the nonrecurring cost for digging the channel should be easily justified by the additional $252 per hectare net return.

The tabulated economic analysis is a traditional approach to project analysis from a developed country viewpoint where economic criteria are based upon the principle of "maximizing profit."


Table 12-1. Production costs and returns in dollars per hectare

Table 12-1. Production costs and returns in dollars per hectare


Traditional rainfed crop

Irrigated with traditional technology

Irrigated with improved crop technology

Production Costs

a. Seed

4.00

5.00

20.00

b. Fertilizer

-

-

140.00

d. Animal power

43.00

45.00

50.00

e. Labor, crop production

15.00

30.00

40.00

f. Labor, Dam construction & system maintenance

-

120.00

120.00

g. Turn-outs

-

25.00

25.00

h. Taxes

2.00

3.00

7.00

TOTAL COSTS

64.00

228.00

412.00

Returns

a. Yield (MT/ha)

2.00

3.00

7.00

b. Gross return @ $120/MT

240.00

360.00

840.00

Net Returns

176.00

132.00

428.00

TO PREVIOUS SECTION OF BOOK TO NEXT SECTION OF BOOK

CD3WD Project Donate