Apart from a set of ordinary masonry irnplements (eg spades, measuring pans, wheelbarrows, sieves, trowels, sand and cement batching boxes, balance and the like), the production of FCR and MCR elements requires some special equipment:
· screeding machines
·
moulds
· testing equipment.
Screeding machine
· This comprises a vibrating screeding
surface and interchangeable, hinged frame (for products of different shapes and
thicknesses). The machine can be a small, portable 'mini-plant', or a stationary
workstation.
· The vibrating mechanism requires an energy source, which
can be electricity (from a mains outlet, converted to 12 volt dc powerby a
transformer-rectifier; or from a car battery), handpower (crank with pulley
system or metal springs), foot-power (treadle or bicycle pedal system), or
flywheel energy (hand-operated).
Advantages and problems of the various screeding machines
· Electric machines:
+ relatively
quiet, do not tire out the user, produce uniform, good quality elements;
-
relatively expensive, dependent on reliable power supplies for operating the
machines or recharging batteries, risk of production setback due to bad battery
maintenance.
· Hand-powerd
machines:
+ independent of power supplies and can thus
be used in remote rural areas;
- relatively noisy end tiring and needs 2
people to operate, uniformity of vibration dependent on the way the handle is
turned, thus possibility of non-uniform quality of
products.
· Foot-powered
machines:
+more or less the same advantages and
disadvantages as hand-powered machines, except that, depending on the design,
the second worker can be omitted, as the hands remain free to spread the mortar
duringvibration.
· Flywheel-powered
machines:
+ incorporate all the advantages of electric
and hand-powered machines and can be operated by a single person;
- cost
about the same as electric machines.
Setting moulds
· These can be of various shapes and sizes, depending on
the local requirements and are needed in large numbers - at least as many as the
number of components produced in two working days, because the tiles are
demoulded after 24 hours.
· The moulds can be made of different
materials, such as vacuum formed PVC (polyvinyl chloride) and fibreglass. FCR
and MCR producers in developing countries have devised methods of making moulds
out of concrete. These are produced in 3 stages: first making a concrete
'grandmother mould', from which several concrete 'mother moulds' are formed and
sold to local tilemakers, who make the actual concrete moulds themselves. More
recently, plywood 'mother moulds' have been devised, eliminating the
'grandmother mould'.
· The PVC and fibreglass moulds are designed for
self-stacking; in most cases, the concrete moulds are placed in special wooden
racks for initial curing, but self-stacking concrete moulds (either entirely
concrete or with metal frames) have also been developed.
Advantages and problems of the various types of setting
moulds
· PVC moulds:
+ produced industrially and
hence uniform and of good quality, extremely lightweight and easy to handle, can
be stacked airtight (vital requirement for curing) and save storage space;
-
most expensive moulds, no local production in developing
countries.
· Fibreglass moduls:
+
similar advantages as PVC moulds, can be produced locally if the materials and
skills are available;
- tend to be less accurate than PVC
moulds.
· Concrete moulds:
+
extremely cheap and can be produced by the tilemaker himself;
- heavy and
less accurate than PVC, and if not self-stacking and not airtight, the rack in
which they are placed has to be well covered with a plastic sheet (which is
often not done carefully, causing the green tiles to crack due to non-uniform
drying).
Testing Equipment
· Several tests should be carried out before, during and
after the production process to ensure that FCR and MCR products arc of
consistently good quality. The tests are generally very simple and only a few
need special equipment.
· Some FCR/MCR machines are equipped with a
demoulding jig, on which the 24 hour old tiles are placed upside down, together
with the setting mould, which can then be lifted off. Subsequently, the plastic
sheet can be peeled off carefully and the rough edges trimmed off. A close fit
of the tile and the edges being in line with those of the jig show that the tile
has exactly the right shape.
· After curing and drying, random samples
of tiles from each batch produced should be tested as follows:
· Ring
test: holding the tile by the nib and knocking a coin on the tile - a clear
metallic sound should be heard.
· Bending test: placing the tile
across a gap of 35 cm between two tables and, in the centre, hanging a piece of
wood (with a curved edge to fit in vertical position exactly on the tile), which
can be loaded with different weights 6 mm thick tiles should resist at least 30
kg; 8 mm tiles 50 kg, and 10 mm tiles 80 kg.
· Nib tensile test:
clamping the tile at the edge of a table, allowing 50 mm of the tile to project
beyond the edge with the nib on the underside, and hanging a weight from the
wire loop - the tile should withstand a load of at least 20 kg.
·
Water tightness test: placing the tile horizontally, forming mortar barriers at
the extreme ends of the channel, and after they have dried, filling the channel
with water- after 24 hours, no drops should be visible on the underside.
· These and many other tests are described in greater detail in the
SKAT/ILO publication, Quality Control Guidelines, which can be obtained from the
Roofing Advisory Service of SKAT, Tigerbergstrasse 2, CH - 9000 St. Call,
Switzerland.